Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
In September 2022, European Commissioners published updates to the Manual on Borderline and Classification for Medical Devices, which provides clarifications for classifying devices as medical or in vitro diagnostic devices under the MDR and IVDR. This guidance describes how to distinguish medical devices from medicinal products, biocides, and personal protective equipment, and how to distinguish between in vitro diagnostic medical devices and general laboratory equipment.
In this “Critical Concepts” webinar, we discuss rules for device classification under each regulation, as well as the risk-based classification rules as described in MDCH 2021-24 and MDCG 2020-16.
Key Takeaways
Who Should Watch?
Those Regulatory, Quality, and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review, or approval of clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions.
Who are the Panelists?
President Laurie Mitchell
Sign up for future webinars here.
Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?
Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
In this webinar, we review the conformity requirements for legacy devices under the MDR and established devices under the IVDR to help you harness the potential of effective post market activities.
We discuss how legacy devices, defined as those previously certified under MDD/AIMDD, can demonstrate conformity to the general safety and performance requirements under the MDR through a collection of pre-market and post-market data.
Key Takeaways
Who Should Watch?
Those Regulatory, Quality, and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review, or approval of clinical evaluation reports for IVDR or MDR submissions.
Who are the Panelists?
Stacie Beecham and Dr. Sarah Chavez
Sign up for future webinars here.
Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?
Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
Presented from the point of view of seasoned MDR-compliant CER medical writers, this session takes a practical approach to define safety and performance objectives, clinical outcomes, clinical benefits, acceptance criteria, and risk-benefit ratio related to the CER. Our experts discuss how to develop MDR-aligned safety and performance objectives, how clinical outcomes are leveraged, and tie it all together in the Risk-Benefit section of the CER.
Key Takeaways
Who Should Watch?
Those Regulatory, Quality, and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review, or approval of clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions.
Who are the Panelists?
President Laurie Mitchell
Sign up for future webinars here.
Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?
This session is presented from the point of view of seasoned MDR-compliant CER medical writers. In this 45-minute live Q&A, we will answer questions regarding critical concepts for a clinical evaluation report template such as safety and performance objectives, clinical outcomes, clinical benefits, acceptance criteria, and risk-benefit ratio. We hope to provide you with best practices and writing strategies to support solid planning during your own writing process.
During this session, come prepared with your questions for our experts to answer. Please submit your questions ahead of time while registering for this session so we have ample time to answer them thoughtfully. Also, please be aware that answers will be limited to 3 minutes per question.
This forum will answer questions on a first come first serve basis, so please submit all your questions when you register for this event.
Click here to watch the recording of this session.
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review, or approve clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions or performance evaluation reports for IVDR submissions.
Are you looking for best tips on how to create a robust systematic literature review process? And maybe even an informative case study illustrating the process? Watch our webinar on effective systematic literature review for post-market surveillance to understand how to continually support your device once your clinical evaluation report is completed and submitted. Learn how leveraging published data can help meet regulatory expectations and inform internal decision-making, the steps for conducting a methodologically-sound SLR, and even how data obtained through SLR can empower the successful execution of post-market surveillance activities, drive efficiencies, and support regulatory compliance.
Do you know how to identify meaningful safety and performance endpoints (measures/objectives)? Are you confidently able to demonstrate that your safety and performance objectives are appropriate and clinically relevant?
Download our free white paper, a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover strategies to verify device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation of medical and in vitro diagnostic (IVDs) devices. This white paper should help you with identifying meaningful safety and performance measures for clinical or performance evaluation. It will also help with defining acceptance criteria parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk as mandated by Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746.
Safety and performance objectives…..clinical outcomes…..clinical benefits…..acceptance criteria…..risk-benefit ratio. These terms represent key concepts of the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER), yet confusion still exists on how to effectively identify, present and analyze these parameters within the context of an MDR-compliant CER. How do they tie together? How do they help you “tell the story” of the CER?
Click here to watch the recording of this session.
Presented from the point of view of seasoned MDR-compliant CER medical writers, this session will take a practical approach to:
There will be time at the end of this session to ask questions. Please submit your questions ahead of time while registering for this session so we have ample time to answer them thoughtfully. You may choose to send in your questions during the presentation as well.
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review, or approve clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions. Anyone interested in learning more about MDR requirements for CERs is also welcome to attend. Also, we encourage professionals from the IVD industry to attend as well, as the content is also relevant to IVDR requirements, which align closely with MDR.
This white paper is a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover strategies to verify device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation of medical and in vitro diagnostic (IVDs) devices. This white paper should help you with identifying meaningful safety and performance measures for clinical or performance evaluation and with defining acceptance criteria parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk as mandated by Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746.
Establishing your device’s safety and performance is a critical component of the clinical evaluation process. However, how to use the state of the art section within the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) and Performance Evaluation Report (PER) to establish the device’s safety and performance objectives and acceptance criteria can seem ambiguous.
Fill out this form, or contact us at info@criterionedge.com, and we would be happy to answer any of your questions as well as book you an appointment to discuss your project needs during a time that works for you.
In this discussion, we provide an overview of how to plan and coordinate change within an organization to meet upcoming EU IVDR regulatory requirements. We will be highlighting key steps involved in helping medical affairs transition to a more rigorous regulatory environments, and how to evaluate talent gaps, team leadership composition, and process challenges of your product portfolio.
In this discussion, our panel of proven leaders discuss the key elements that support and propel the innovation process in the medical device, pharmaceutical, and IVD industries. We will be highlighting key areas of the process, important players in the pathway to the market, and how successful innovations spawn new innovations in new markets such as the digital health space, and more.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Read more about our privacy policy here.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
This website uses Google Tag Manager and Pardot's tracking features to collect information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
