With the implementation of IVDR requirements, IVD manufacturers have been challenged to align their internal processes and systems to comply with these rigorous regulations. In this practical presentation, Criterion Edge uncovers what we have learned from our experience in writing MDR-compliant CERs, and how urgently applicable some of these key learnings are in preparing a robust Performance Evaluation Report (PER).
This presentation provides practical tips on how to assess for hidden traps and unexpected roadblocks that could impact the success of writing an IVDR-compliant PER. By performing a gap analysis and assessing the readiness and availability of critical resources, documents and expertise, you will be able to avoid project delays and discover efficiencies that will enable the on-time completion of a successful, IVDR-compliant PER.
Learning Objectives:
Click here to watch the webinar recording and download the presentation slides.
Who is this webinar for?
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review or approval of performance evaluation reports for IVDR submissions.
Healthcare companies continually strive to communicate important information about their drugs and devices to diverse audiences comprised of patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals (HCPs), and the general public. The use of plain language written content ensures key health information and clinical research findings are understandable and accessible to all.
Click here to watch this recent webinar to learn key elements of plain language written content, how to identify the target audience, selecting the most appropriate dissemination channels for the information, the challenges to produce a multitude of plain language written deliverables for multiple audiences, and more.
This session is presented from the point of view of seasoned MDR-compliant CER medical writers. In this 45-minute live Q&A, we will answer questions regarding critical concepts for a clinical evaluation report template such as safety and performance objectives, clinical outcomes, clinical benefits, acceptance criteria, and risk-benefit ratio. We hope to provide you with best practices and writing strategies to support solid planning during your own writing process.
During this session, come prepared with your questions for our experts to answer. Please submit your questions ahead of time while registering for this session so we have ample time to answer them thoughtfully. Also, please be aware that answers will be limited to 3 minutes per question.
This forum will answer questions on a first come first serve basis, so please submit all your questions when you register for this event.
Click here to watch the recording of this session.
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review, or approve clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions or performance evaluation reports for IVDR submissions.
Are you looking for best tips on how to create a robust systematic literature review process? And maybe even an informative case study illustrating the process? Watch our webinar on effective systematic literature review for post-market surveillance to understand how to continually support your device once your clinical evaluation report is completed and submitted. Learn how leveraging published data can help meet regulatory expectations and inform internal decision-making, the steps for conducting a methodologically-sound SLR, and even how data obtained through SLR can empower the successful execution of post-market surveillance activities, drive efficiencies, and support regulatory compliance.
Do you know how to identify meaningful safety and performance endpoints (measures/objectives)? Are you confidently able to demonstrate that your safety and performance objectives are appropriate and clinically relevant?
Download our free white paper, a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover strategies to verify device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation of medical and in vitro diagnostic (IVDs) devices. This white paper should help you with identifying meaningful safety and performance measures for clinical or performance evaluation. It will also help with defining acceptance criteria parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk as mandated by Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746.
Safety and performance objectives…..clinical outcomes…..clinical benefits…..acceptance criteria…..risk-benefit ratio. These terms represent key concepts of the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER), yet confusion still exists on how to effectively identify, present and analyze these parameters within the context of an MDR-compliant CER. How do they tie together? How do they help you “tell the story” of the CER?
Click here to watch the recording of this session.
Presented from the point of view of seasoned MDR-compliant CER medical writers, this session will take a practical approach to:
There will be time at the end of this session to ask questions. Please submit your questions ahead of time while registering for this session so we have ample time to answer them thoughtfully. You may choose to send in your questions during the presentation as well.
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review, or approve clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions. Anyone interested in learning more about MDR requirements for CERs is also welcome to attend. Also, we encourage professionals from the IVD industry to attend as well, as the content is also relevant to IVDR requirements, which align closely with MDR.
This white paper is a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover strategies to verify device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation of medical and in vitro diagnostic (IVDs) devices. This white paper should help you with identifying meaningful safety and performance measures for clinical or performance evaluation and with defining acceptance criteria parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk as mandated by Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746.
Establishing your device’s safety and performance is a critical component of the clinical evaluation process. However, how to use the state of the art section within the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) and Performance Evaluation Report (PER) to establish the device’s safety and performance objectives and acceptance criteria can seem ambiguous.
Regulatory Affairs is poised to play a critical role in supporting the current MDR and IVDR required clinical and performance evaluation process, from project implementation through report writing and finally, the on-time submission to the notified body. In this session, we answer questions from many stages of the writing process, from the early planning stage through completion of all required written deliverables. Topics include early assessment of data sufficiency, equivalence considerations, internal readiness of critical documentation, project planning strategies, or how to identify potential roadblocks and proactively find solutions to common problems.
Click here to watch the recording of this session.
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review, or approve clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions or performance evaluation reports for IVDR submissions.
In today’s medical device and pharmaceutical environment, it’s imperative to analyze and present complex information clearly and concisely while meeting critical timelines. Partnering with team of experienced regulatory writers can be a beneficial alternative to maintaining an in-house writing staff.
Read our blog post to help decide if outsourcing is the right decision for your team.
Do you know how to identify meaningful safety and performance endpoints (measures/objectives)? Are you confidently able to demonstrate that your safety and performance objectives are appropriate and clinically relevant?
Download our free white paper, a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover strategies to verify device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation of medical and in vitro diagnostic (IVDs) devices. This white paper should help you with identifying meaningful safety and performance measures for clinical or performance evaluation. It will also help with defining acceptance criteria parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk as mandated by Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746.
Regulatory Affairs plays a critical role in supporting the current MDR and IVDR required clinical/performance evaluation process, from project implementation through report writing and finally, the on-time submission to the notified body. From the early planning stage through completion of all required written deliverables, this presentation examines key drivers of project success, such as early assessment of data sufficiency, equivalence considerations, internal readiness of critical documentation, project planning strategies, and how to identify potential roadblocks and proactively find solutions to common problems.
Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
Key Takeaways:
1. Identify critical components of the clinical evaluation process and strategies to support project success.
2. Describe how Regulatory Affairs can support cross-functional stakeholders and lead critical decision-making throughout the clinical evaluation process.
3. Recognize and implement early mitigation strategies to overcome roadblocks and drive to on-time submission.
There will be time at the end of the presentation to get your questions answered. Please submit your questions ahead of time while registering for this session so we have ample time to answer them thoughtfully. Also, answers will be limited to 3 minutes per question.
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review, or approve clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions or performance evaluation reports for IVDR submissions.
In today’s medical device and pharmaceutical environment, it’s imperative to analyze and present complex information clearly and concisely while meeting critical timelines. Partnering with team of experienced regulatory writers can be a beneficial alternative to maintaining an in-house writing staff.
Read our blog post to help decide if outsourcing is the right decision for your team.
Do you know how to identify meaningful safety and performance endpoints (measures/objectives)? Are you confidently able to demonstrate that your safety and performance objectives are appropriate and clinically relevant?
Download our free white paper, a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover strategies to verify device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation of medical and in vitro diagnostic (IVDs) devices. This white paper should help you with identifying meaningful safety and performance measures for clinical or performance evaluation. It will also help with defining acceptance criteria parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk as mandated by Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746.
Fill out this form, or contact us at info@criterionedge.com, and we would be happy to answer any of your questions as well as book you an appointment to discuss your project needs during a time that works for you.
In this discussion, we provide an overview of how to plan and coordinate change within an organization to meet upcoming EU IVDR regulatory requirements. We will be highlighting key steps involved in helping medical affairs transition to a more rigorous regulatory environments, and how to evaluate talent gaps, team leadership composition, and process challenges of your product portfolio.
In this discussion, our panel of proven leaders discuss the key elements that support and propel the innovation process in the medical device, pharmaceutical, and IVD industries. We will be highlighting key areas of the process, important players in the pathway to the market, and how successful innovations spawn new innovations in new markets such as the digital health space, and more.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Read more about our privacy policy here.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
This website uses Google Tag Manager and Pardot's tracking features to collect information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
