August 26, 2021

[FREE WEBINAR] Clinical Evaluation: Measurable Objectives and Acceptance Criteria to Verify Device Safety and Performance

Clinical Evaluation: Measurable Objectives and Acceptance Criteria to Verify Device Safety and Performance

Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.

This webinar is presented from the point of view of seasoned MDR-compliant CER medical writers. Criterion Edge discusses strategies for the verification of device safety and performance in the clinical evaluation. Next, we teach you how to identify meaningful safety and performance measures for the clinical evaluation and define parameters to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk.

Key Takeaways:

Based on the state-of-the-art

  • Identify meaningful safety and performance endpoints (measures/objectives) 
  • Demonstrate that safety and performance objectives are appropriate and clinically relevant 
  • Specify acceptance criteria that are used to determine the acceptability of benefit-risk 

Who Should Watch:

  • Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and regulatory writers who develop, write, review or approve Clinical Evaluation Reports for EU MDR submission. Additionally, anyone interested in learning more about MDR requirements for CERs is encouraged to watch as well. Finally, we encourage viewers from the IVD industry as well, as the content is relevant to IVDR requirements, which align closely with MDR. 

Who are the Panelists?

Laurie Mitchell, President | Criterion Edge

Sign up for future webinars or view our events calendar.


Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?

Categories:
Do you like it?0
August 5, 2021

[FREE WEBINAR] How to Establish the State of the Art Within the Scientific Validity Report

Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.

In this practical presentation, Criterion Edge presents focused strategies on building an IVDR-aligned State of the Art (SOA) section within the Scientific Validity Report (SVR). We also talk about the critical role of the SVR as it relates to the overall performance evaluation process.

Key Takeaways:

  • The foundational role of the SOA in the SVR
  • The required components of the SOA such as the safety and performance objectives
  • The importance of a robust systematic literature review (SLR) to support your SOA

Who Should Watch:

  • Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and regulatory writers who are tasked with the development, writing, review or approval of Scientific Validity Reports for EU IVDR submission, or anyone interested in learning more about the SOA section within the SVR.

Who are the Panelists?

Dr. Sarah Chavez, Principal Medical Writer | Criterion Edge

Sign up for future webinars here.


Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?

Categories:
Do you like it?0
July 21, 2021

[FREE WHITE PAPER] State of the Art: Establishing a Solid Foundation For Your PERs to Encourage IVDR Readiness

Overview

This white paper is a companion piece to our popular webinar where we cover the state of the art process and how it fits into the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR).

Manufacturers are expected to demonstrate a thorough clinical evaluation of the IVD in the context of what is generally acknowledged to reflect the most current best-practice science. To establish that your IVD is SOA, you must be able to show how it fits into the entire scientific landscape and explain the circumstances and diagnostic scenarios by which the IVD can be considered SOA.

Solution

Knowing what the Notified Body expects to see will help you avoid …

Download the rest of this white paper here.


Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?

Categories:
Do you like it?0
July 12, 2021

[FREE WHITE PAPER] Systematic Literature Review: How to Empower Data-Driven Decisions in Your Organization

Overview

This white paper is a companion piece to our popular webinar where we share our insights on using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to Empower Data-Driven Decisions in your Organization.

Every day, pharma and medical device companies need data from SLRs to inform, direct, and help drive their internal processes and decisions that move their companies forward. Of course, clinical literature is also required for compliance with global regulatory requirements. Conducting SLRs to search, screen, and extract data from published sources can present challenges to your team in terms of expertise (e.g., medical librarian), methodology, and resources. It takes trained people with the availability to screen, review, and analyze the literature.

Solution

Adopting a transparent, reproducible, and robust process for SLRs is essential to …

Download the rest of this white paper here.


Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?

Categories:
Do you like it?0
July 9, 2021

[FREE WEBINAR] Are You Reg. Ready? Get your medical affairs team primed to manage new regulatory requirements.

Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.

There’s been plenty of discussion on the submission scope of current EU MDR and pending EU IVDR regulatory requirements for medical device manufactures. But what of organizational change management readiness? How should a medical device organization’s different business functions collaborate and align their people, processes, and knowledge to meet these regulatory requirements effectively and efficiently?

Watch the recorded webinar for a behind the scenes look at how one company is managing change within their organization. Dr. Imelda Omana-Zapata, BD Senior Manager Clinical Projects, will provide an overview of how she is planning and coordinating change within her organization to meet upcoming EU IVDR regulatory requirements. Laurie Mitchell, Founder and President of Criterion Edge, will discuss the critical technology and expertise required to meet more rigorous scientific validated submissions to notify bodies.

Key Takeaways:

  • Key steps involved in helping medical affairs transition to a more rigorous regulatory environments.
  • How to evaluate talent gaps, team leadership composition, and process challenges of your product portfolio.
  • Critical systematic literature review technology and experience required to ensure CER and PER submissions are audit-ready and compliant.

Who Should Watch:

  • Medical Device & Diagnostics Professionals (from small-medium sized to large enterprises)

Who are the Panelists?

Laurie Mitchell, President | Criterion Edge
Dr. Imelda Omana-Zapata, Senior Manager, Clinical Projects | BD

Sign up for future webinars here.


Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?

Categories:
Do you like it?0