August 12, 2021

[Ask the Expert] Performance Evaluation Report

performance evaluation report

This session’s topic: The Performance Evaluation Report (PER)

With the implementation of IVDR requirements, IVD manufacturers have been challenged to align their internal processes and systems to comply with these rigorous regulations. What challenges are you or your team currently facing? Which areas do you need performance evaluation report guidance?

During this 45-minute Q&A session, our President Laurie Mitchell and Principal Medical Writer Dr. Sarah Chavez answered questions on the biggest pitfalls to look out for when writing a PER. In addition, they discuss how to align your internal processes and systems to comply with rigorous IVDR regulations and what technical documents are required for the PER, PEP, and PMPF.

Who should watch this webinar?

Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review or approve Performance Evaluation Reports for EU IVDR submission.

Watch the recording!

What You Need to Be Compliant

Watch our recent webinar for more performance evaluation report guidance. We provide an overview of the State of the Art section, and explain how it fits into the overall process of writing a successful, IVDR-compliant PER. Additionally, we discuss the importance of readiness assessments and gap analyses. Then we help you identify critical resources, feeder documents, and expertise needed to consider your IVD “state-of-the-art.” Ultimately, knowing what the Notified Body expects to see will help you avoid project delays and discover efficiencies in the SOA development process.

Ultimately, the In Vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation 2017/746 is making sweeping changes to the EU regulatory requirements for IVD devices. Read our blog post for more on this topic. In it, we introduce some of the major requirements and list some of the important considerations for IVDR 2017/746 compliance.

Categories:
Do you like it?0
August 11, 2021

[Ask the Expert] Systematic Literature Review

systematic literature review

This session’s topic: Systematic Literature Review: What is it and why is it so important?

Do you have specific questions about the steps of the systematic literature review process or questions regarding your medical device or IVD? During this 45-minute Q&A session, our President Laurie Mitchell answers questions about the steps to conduct a methodologically sound SLR​​. In addition, she discusses how to leverage published data to meet regulatory expectations and inform internal decision-making from marketing initiatives and clinical strategies to global regulatory requirements.

Who should watch this webinar?

Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who develop, write, review or approve Systematic Literature Reviews for EU MDR or IVDR submissions, meta-analyses, regulatory response support, development of clinical marketing materials, etc.

Watch the recording!

Watch Our Related Webinar for an In-Depth Look at the SLR Process

With the implementation of IVDR and MDR requirements, device manufacturers often struggle to align their internal processes and systems to comply with these rigorous regulations. Consequently, companies realize the need to review published literature for device-specific clinical data. However many manufacturers may not be familiar with or have the capability to perform all steps of the rigorous systematic literature review process, including screening, selection and data extraction. 

Watch our webinar where we break down the steps of the SLR process and take a wholistic approach to conducting an IVDR-compliant SLR. Using case studies, the presentation illustrates the effective use of SLR-derived data to develop the Scientific Validity Report (SVR) and the Clinical Performance Report (CPR). We encourage professionals from the medical device industry to watch as well, as the content is also relevant to MDR requirements, which align closely with IVDR.

Categories:
Do you like it?0
June 15, 2021

[FEATURED] Sprinting To Approval: Insider Tips On FDA’s Breakthrough Devices Program

Manufacturers applying to the program should be ready for questions from the US agency, an FDA official says.

Do you like it?0
April 6, 2021

[FEATURED] Device Firms In Non-EU Markets Using The CE Mark Should Expect Some MDR Disruption After May

Health care is about to suffer a major setback and some devices and IVDs are going to have to be held back from the market if the regulatory status of the humble swab is not sufficiently recognized and urgently addressed.

Do you like it?0
March 16, 2021

[FEATURED] Signs Of Hope But Obstacles Remain For Swiss Device MRA With EU

Without the MRA that allows unimpeded bilateral device trade between the EU and Switzerland, Swiss industry is having to find ways of limiting the damage that newly erected barriers will cause after the MDR comes into force.

Do you like it?0

Named the #1 Regulatory Services Company 2022 by Life Sciences Review

X