Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
How do you determine which content applies to each classification? How do you address data insufficiency for a WET or Legacy device? In this webinar, our medical regulatory experts, Dr. Sarah Chavez and Stacie Beecham, answer these questions and outline how to ensure your regulatory strategy will adequately support the clinical evaluation specific to your device.
Key Takeaways
Who Should Watch?
Those Regulatory, Quality, and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review, or approval of clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions.
Who are the Panelists?
Dr. Sarah Chavez, Director of IVD & Scientific Writing Services
Stacie Beecham, Principal Medical Writer
Sign up for future webinars here.
Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?
Author: Criterion Edge Writers
Regulatory Affairs (RA) professionals are poised to play a key role in supporting the clinical or performance evaluation report (CER or PER) process. Regulatory Affairs is active throughout the entire process, from pre-project planning through scoping and kick-off, report writing, review and sign-off, and finally, submission to the notified body.
The CER and PER are highly complex reports—not just because of the large amount of data they contain, but because they must tell a complex story. Putting all the evidence together for a successful submission is a difficult task, but RA is strategically positioned to provide critically important support and guidance to the evaluation writing team.
Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
What do I do if there is no data for my device? This is a concern we hear quite often from clients. MDR states that device groups may not require clinical investigations if sufficient clinical evidence exists, and the device meets specific criteria. In this webinar, we discuss the concept of data sufficiency. Specifically, we explain the differences between a well-established technology and a legacy device as defined by MDR and discuss strategies from both a regulatory and writer’s perspective.
Key Takeaways
Who Should Watch?
Those Regulatory, Quality, and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review, or approval of clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions.
Who are the Panelists?
Dr. Sarah Chavez, Director of IVD & Scientific Writing Services
Stacie Beecham, Principal Medical Writer
Sign up for future webinars here.
Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?
Author: Criterion Edge Writers
Concerns and frustration surrounding the implementation of Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) were voiced in early May at MedTech Europe’s 2022 Forum in Barcelona. Two notable sessions that discussed MDR and IVDR implementation were reportedly lively and filled to capacity. The chairs of these sessions, Marc Pierre Möll, CEO of BVMed, and Oliver Bisazza, MedTech Europe’s Director General of Industrial Policies and External Affairs, shared their reflections on these discussions in Barcelona and the current impacts of MDR in an interview with MedTech Insight.
Click here to watch the recording of this webinar.
Regulatory Affairs is poised to play a critical role in supporting the current MDR and IVDR required clinical/performance evaluation process, from project implementation through report writing and finally, the on-time submission to the notified body. From the early planning stage through completion of all required written deliverables, this presentation examines key drivers of project success, such as early assessment of data sufficiency, equivalence considerations, internal readiness of critical documentation, project planning strategies, and how to identify potential roadblocks and proactively find solutions to common problems.
Key Takeaways
Who Should Watch?
Those Regulatory, Quality and Clinical leaders and teams who are tasked with the development, writing, review, or approval of clinical evaluation reports for MDR submissions or performance evaluation reports for IVDR submissions.
Who are the Panelists?
Laurie Mitchell, President | Criterion Edge
Sign up for future webinars here.
Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Read more about our privacy policy here.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
This website uses Google Tag Manager and Pardot's tracking features to collect information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
