December 7, 2021

[FEATURED] Are Latest Challenges Threatening To Push Eudamed Launch Date Into 2023?

While nothing is official yet, it seems that the EU is likely to struggle to have two of the six Eudamed modules ready on time. Might this mean a further delay, or will the system be officially launched without them? 


The clinical investigations and the market surveillance modules of the new version of the EU medical device database, Eudamed, are reported to be causing the biggest challenges when it comes to setting up all six modules so that the entire database can be launched in 2022.

“We may even see Eudamed being launched officially with one or both missing, Ronald Boumans, senior consultant, regulatory affairs Emergo by UL, speculated.

Do you like it?0
November 30, 2021

[FEATURED] FDA-Backed Tumor Mutation Database Gives Diagnostics Developers Another Premarket Submission Tool

The US FDA on 7 October recognized a portion of the Oncology Knowledge Base, or OncoKB, which test makers can use as they work to complete premarket submissions. It’s the first database of somatic variants in cancer to be listed in the agency’s Public Human Genetic Variant Databases.


Diagnostics developers now have another tool backed by the US Food and Drug Administration that they can lean on as they work to complete premarket submissions to the agency.

The FDA on 7 October recognized part of a tumor mutation database compiled by the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center. The Oncology Knowledge Base, or OncoKB, is the first database of somatic variants in cancer to be listed in the agency’s Public Human Genetic Variant Databases (PHGVD).

Do you like it?0
November 16, 2021

[FEATURED] Latest European Commission Figures Suggest One More IVDR Notified Body In Pipeline And Then A Gap

The European Commission has updated its figures on the status of readiness of notified bodies under the Medical Device and IVD Regulations. Three more designations are imminent, but just one under the IVDR.


The urgency of having the necessary structures in place, including notified bodies, so that manufacturers can comply with the IVD Regulation, continues to be emphasized by all stakeholders in the EU IVD sector.

Accompanying this is a general sense that there has been a lack of transparency about when additional designations will be made, which hinders companies’ preparations.

The latest figures from the European Commission show that progress is being made, but not as quickly as the sector would like.

Do you like it?0
November 8, 2021

[FEATURED] EN ISO 13485 and EN ISO 14971: Next Wave Of EU Standards Now Due ‘By December’

The EU Medical Device Regulation applied in May, but the 200 or so associated standards that support it remain in the early stages of preparation. A few have been issued, and now industry can expect a small second wave later in 2021.


In a best-case scenario 61% of today’s IVDs will be certified by the 26 May 2022 IVD Regulation deadline, and in a So far, only five standards have been published in the Official Journal of the EU in the context of the EU’s Medical Device Regulation, and four in the context of the IVD Regulation.

But more standards are due to be officially published this year, including the European versions of the international quality system standard EN ISO 13485 and of the risk management standard EN IS0 14971, standards that are the very foundation of the implementation of the MDR and IVDR but which are now going to be officially available later than the originally anticipated October deadline.

Do you like it?0
November 2, 2021

[FREE WHITE PAPER] Practical Guide: Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews in Support of IVDR Readiness

Overview

This white paper is a companion piece to our popular webinar where we break down the steps of the systematic literature review (SLR) process and take a wholistic approach to conducting an In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR)-compliant SLR.

Leveraging published data can help meet global regulatory expectations, fill knowledge gaps, and inform internal decision-making. This applies to IVDR and Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 (MDR) requirements, but for the sake of providing an example, we focus on IVDR here. A methodologically-sound SLR can leverage published data for critical IVDR-required reports (e.g., the Scientific Validity Report, clinical performance). Remember, an SLR is far more than an internet search. It is a clear and robust plan for the identification, retrieval, selection, appraisal, and weighting of published data. SLR has long been the “gold standard” process for evidence-based research, especially in the academic and professional arenas. In today’s regulatory landscape where rigorous methodological SLR principles are now being mandated, adopting a transparent and reproducible process for literature reviews is essential. Every methodologically-sound SLR has 5 clearly defined steps…

Download the rest of this white paper here.


Criterion Edge has the expertise and resources to do literature reviews for many types of documents. Ready for a free consult?

Categories:
Do you like it?0

Named the #1 Regulatory Services Company 2022 by Life Sciences Review

X